To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Can you copyright a song title? That’s the question
at the heart of the recent dispute over Mariah Carey’s seasonal
chart topper All I Want for Christmas is You, as Michaël Sumer explains.
It’s impossible to escape Mariah’s Carey’s All I
Want for Christmas is You in the festive season. First
released in 1994, the song became a worldwide success, much to the
chagrin of Andy Stone, also known by the stage name Vince Vance. He
claims to have written his country song All I Want for
Christmas is You in 1989 and has now taken Carey to court in
the US for copyright infringement, claiming at least US$20 million in damages.
Copyright infringement in the music sector
Copyright law gives the creator of an artistic work, the right
to make the work public and/or to reproduce it. Copyright protects
the work until 70 years after the creator’s death. To be
eligible for copyright protection, however, the work must meet
certain criteria. In particular, the work must be the intellectual
creation of its maker and this creation must be produced in some
way, i.e. written or performed.
Copyright has become big news in the music industry, not least
following the landmark ruling in the Pharrell Williams and Robin
Thicke Blurred Lines dispute. In this case, however,
the only similarity between the two songs is the title and the
repetition of the line in the lyrics. The two songs sound
completely different and otherwise have completely different
Not only does US copyright law state that copyright does not
subsist in a song title, or in an unoriginal piece of text (such as
a short song lyric), but Stone has waited no less than 27 years
before issuing his lawsuit.To fall within the statute of
limitations in the US, a civil action must be brought within three
years of a claim arising. According to Stone, however, the fact
that Carey’s song is still being played today means the alleged
infringement is still ongoing. As a result, Stone’s claim may
not be time-barred under US law, but it does limit his claim to
damages to only three years.
What is this likely to mean in practice?
It is not clear why Stone waited so long to issue his lawsuit,
and Carey’s attorneys may well argue that there is no
justification for filing a claim 27 years after the release of the
song. Furthermore, given that the title and the line from the
lyrics All I Want for Christmas is You is not eligible for
copyright protection, it is expected that Stone’s claims will
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States