A California judge has ruled that a class-action sexual bias lawsuit against Niantic, the creator of Pokémon Go, can proceed, effectively blocking the company’s attempt to move the suit into arbitration. This decision, made by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle, comes as a win for the plaintiffs, two former female employees who alleged they were subjected to a hostile gender-based work environment during their time at Niantic.
The judge found that the allegations raised by the former employees were protected under the 2021 Ending Forced Arbitration Act, which aims to end the practice of forced arbitration in employment disputes. This act has been hailed by many as a crucial step in protecting the rights of employees, particularly in cases of sexual harassment and gender bias.
In response to the ruling, attorney Genie Harrison, representing the plaintiffs, described the outcome as a “watershed moment for sexual harassment and gender bias cases.” She emphasized that the decision clarifies that the protections of the 2021 Ending Forced Arbitration Act encompass cases in which sexual overtures are not the primary focus, broadening the scope of protection for employees facing various forms of gender-based discrimination and harassment in the workplace.
The lawsuit was first filed in July by an anonymous female employee who accused Niantic of fostering a “boys club” environment and alleged that the company denied equal pay to women employees and women of color, while devaluing their work. An amended complaint was later filed in September by a second former employee, who claimed that sexism had hindered her career advancement at Niantic and that a group of female employees were banned from using the term “boys club” to describe the company.
The decision to allow the lawsuit to proceed marks a significant setback for Niantic, which had previously sought to contest the sexual bias lawsuit and move into arbitration. This strategy is often favored by employers, as arbitration systems tend to tilt in their favor over their employees. However, with the efforts to move to arbitration now blocked, the plaintiffs plan to move forward with their suit against the AR app company.
In response to the ruling, a Niantic spokesperson stated, “Niantic is committed to maintaining a fair and welcoming workplace – one where we build games that bring people together in the real world. While we take the allegations very seriously, they do not reflect how we operate as a company, and we do not believe the action has merit.”
The outcome of this case has far-reaching implications for the tech industry and beyond, as it underscores the importance of addressing systemic sexism and bias in the workplace. It also serves as a reminder of the continuing struggle for gender equality and the need for companies to take proactive measures to create inclusive and respectful work environments.
As the case moves forward, it is likely to draw significant attention from the industry and legal experts, as it raises critical questions about the treatment of women and minorities in the tech sector. The outcome of this lawsuit could potentially set a precedent for similar cases in the future, shaping the way companies address gender-based discrimination and harassment within their organizations.
In conclusion, the judge’s ruling to allow the class-action sexual bias lawsuit against Niantic to proceed represents a significant victory for the plaintiffs and a step forward in the ongoing fight for gender equality in the workplace. This decision sends a powerful message to companies about the importance of addressing bias and discrimination, and the need to create inclusive and respectful work environments for all employees.
