The recent statement by Writers Guild of America West (WGAW) president Meredith Stiehm regarding the Hamas attack on Israel has sparked controversy and raised questions about the union’s stance on important issues. While other guilds and organizations have been able to come to a consensus and make clear statements condemning the attack, the WGAW board has decided not to comment publicly. This decision has not sit well with many, including members of the filmmaking community who have personal connections to the situation.
In her statement, Stiehm mentioned that the board’s viewpoints are varied and that consensus was not attainable. However, considering the severity of the Hamas attack and the widespread condemnation from various quarters, it seems implausible that a group of writers who are skilled at finding common ground and tackling complex plot points could not reach an agreement in this case. This raises questions about the lack of courage and moral clarity within the board.
The situation is reminiscent of the Red Scare in the 1950s when many writers were blacklisted and unable to work because of their alleged ties to communism. The predecessor of the WGAW, the Screen Writers Guild, also struggled to find consensus on speaking out against the injustice. It took decades for the guild leadership to apologize for their silence and lack of courage during that time. One wonders how long it will take the current leadership of the WGAW to acknowledge their failure to address the wanton slaughter of Jewish men, women, and children by a terrorist organization.
The importance of taking a stand against evil cannot be understated. Albert Einstein once said, “The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.” This quote serves as a reminder that silence in the face of injustice only perpetuates it. The WGAW has an opportunity to show moral leadership and stand with the victims of the Hamas attack.
Related Post
The lack of a public statement from the WGAW is particularly concerning given the union’s history of actively commenting on and engaging with controversial issues. The guild has never shied away from expressing its opinion on matters affecting its members and the broader community. However, this particular writers room seems to have encountered a roadblock when it comes to the largest slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust. This raises questions about why this issue is different and why consensus could not be reached.
It is worth noting that the filmmakers who have spoken out against the Hamas attack have personal connections to the situation. Some have family members in Israel, including young soldiers and hostages held in Gaza. These individuals understand the gravity of the situation and the urgent need for condemnation. Their voices carry weight and should be taken seriously.
As the industry continues to grapple with issues of diversity, representation, and social responsibility, it is crucial for organizations like the WGAW to lead by example. Taking a stand against terrorism and in support of human rights should not be subject to a lack of consensus or internal divisions. The film industry has a powerful platform and influence, and it should be used to promote justice, equality, and peace.
In conclusion, the lack of a public statement from the WGAW regarding the Hamas attack on Israel is concerning and has sparked criticism within the industry. The inability to reach consensus raises questions about the board’s courage and moral clarity. The guild has a responsibility to protect its membership and stand against injustice. It is time for the board to come together, acknowledge the gravity of the situation, and condemn the actions of the terrorist organization. Silence in the face of evil is not an option.
