Sara Ramírez recently took to Instagram to address the ongoing criticisms surrounding their character, Che Diaz, in the TV series “And Just Like That.” In their statement, Ramírez emphasized that questions regarding the character’s development should be directed towards the series’ writers. They urged critics not to conflate the representation of their nonbinary character with their personal identity in real life.
Ramírez asserted that they are not the fictional characters they portray and are not responsible for the dialogue written for those characters. They emphasized their role as a human being, artist, and actor. They acknowledged the increasingly hostile world towards those who challenge the gender binary and disrupt mainstream norms.
Furthermore, Ramírez questioned why they are being asked about Diaz’s dialogue, which is ultimately controlled by a cisgender man. They suggested that if there are concerns about the dialogue, the focus should be on the person overseeing it. In doing so, Ramírez aimed to redirect the criticism towards the ultimate decision-makers behind the character’s development.
This statement from Ramírez follows a June profile in The Cut that explored the actor and the show. They defended their character in response to what they perceived as an attempt to mock their thoughtfulness and softness. Ramírez expressed their willingness to use their dry sense of humor and voice to address these critiques.
It is not the first time Ramírez has responded to critics of their character. Che Diaz was introduced as Carrie Bradshaw’s podcast co-host in the first season of “And Just Like That” and later developed a relationship with Miranda Hobbs, a central character in the series. During the first season, Ramírez expressed that they did not recognize themselves in the character amid negative reviews and criticisms labeling Che Diaz as the worst character on television.
Despite the hate and criticisms they receive online, Ramírez emphasized the importance of protecting their mental health and artistic integrity. They take pride in the representation they have built through their character, emphasizing the complexity, imperfections, and authenticity of Che Diaz. Ramírez highlighted that the character is not meant to be universally liked or seek approval but instead exists to be true to themselves.
The Instagram post from Ramírez included two photos of them and served as a reminder that actors are separate entities from the characters they portray. They encouraged a separation between fiction and reality, emphasizing that their role does not define who they are as individuals.
This statement from Ramírez sheds light on the ongoing challenges faced by actors when their characters come under scrutiny. It highlights the need to separate the actor from their role and to hold the writers and decision-makers accountable for the character’s development and dialogue.
Ramírez’s response serves as a reminder to critics that actors are real people who have their own thoughts and feelings. Their portrayal of a character should be understood as a creative interpretation rather than a reflection of their personal identity. Through their statement, Ramírez advocates for a more thoughtful and empathetic approach to considering the artistic choices made in the creation of characters.